<?xml version="1.0"?>
<oembed><version>1.0</version><provider_name>Konings Maters</provider_name><provider_url>https://www.koningsmaters.nl/en/</provider_url><author_name>Konings Maters</author_name><author_url>https://www.koningsmaters.nl/en/author/productplus/</author_url><title>Kamervragen invloed Didam-arrest op pachtovereenkomsten - Konings Maters</title><type>rich</type><width>600</width><height>338</height><html>&lt;blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="6xDSRugAfN"&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.koningsmaters.nl/en/agro/kamervragen-invloed-didam-arrest-op-pachtovereenkomsten/"&gt;Kamervragen invloed Didam-arrest op pachtovereenkomsten&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://www.koningsmaters.nl/en/agro/kamervragen-invloed-didam-arrest-op-pachtovereenkomsten/embed/#?secret=6xDSRugAfN" width="600" height="338" title="&#x201C;Kamervragen invloed Didam-arrest op pachtovereenkomsten&#x201D; &#x2014; Konings Maters" data-secret="6xDSRugAfN" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;script&gt;
/*! This file is auto-generated */
!function(d,l){"use strict";l.querySelector&amp;&amp;d.addEventListener&amp;&amp;"undefined"!=typeof URL&amp;&amp;(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&amp;&amp;!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=new RegExp("^https?:$","i"),i=0;i&lt;o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i&lt;a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&amp;&amp;(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3&lt;(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r&lt;200&amp;&amp;(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&amp;&amp;(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&amp;&amp;n.host===r.host&amp;&amp;l.activeElement===s&amp;&amp;(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r&lt;s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document);
//# sourceURL=https://www.koningsmaters.nl/wp-includes/js/wp-embed.min.js
&lt;/script&gt;
</html><thumbnail_url>https://www.koningsmaters.nl/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/b1add80a-22d6-425f-b2dc-e4fcd226cdf4.jpg</thumbnail_url><thumbnail_width>800</thumbnail_width><thumbnail_height>493</thumbnail_height><description>In het zogenaamde Didamarrest uit 2021 heeft de Hoge Raad geoordeeld dat een overheidslichaam een onroerende zaak niet onderhands mag verkopen zonder andere gegadigden de mogelijkheid te bieden om een bod uit te brengen. Als er meerdere gegadigden zijn of</description></oembed>
